Tuesday, February 25, 2014

The Role Of A Western OLPI And Offshore Legal Provider Capabilities 5

Feeny et al. (2005)[1] have attempted a deeper analysis and have identified
12 key provider capabilities that an OLPI should explore with the lawyer:

1.       Leadership: Leadership refers to the capability of delivering the desired result throughout the deal. Feeny et al. noted that according to their research, individuals who occupied provider leadership roles had a considerable impact on the success of an outsourcing venture. More specifically, the authors found that although individual provider firms were consistent in the way they contracted and governed, 76% of the deals under study were identified by the interviewees as successful and 24% were seen as unsuccessful. The main differentiating factor between success and failure was the individual leading the provider account teams. Feeny et al. (2005) additionally suggested that when examining how these leaders could generate a difference to the outsourcing result, three patterns emerged. First, in unsuccessful cases, the leader of the provider team was often seen to be too much focused on business management issues (i.e. delivery, meeting SLAs while delivering the required profit margin to the provider, and so forth) which, although important, are distinct from leadership. Second, the quality of the relationship between the leaders of the provider’s and the lawyer’s teams exerts an impact on the wider lawyer-provider relationship. Third, the relationship between the leader of the provider’s team and the top management of the provider’s organization can be a critical success factor. Because most providers tend to create more of a front-end team rather than a full function business unit when serving a lawyer, the local team is extremely dependent on its leader’s relationship with headquarters to gain access to key resources and approval for lawyer-aligned business policies.



[1] Feeny, D., Lacity, M., and Willcocks, L.P. (2005), “Taking the measure of outsourcing providers,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3): 41–48.

No comments:

Post a Comment